01
02
03
04
Sections
“Design by committee” goes wrong when an organisation lacks an explicit decision system. Feedback comes from people who judge by different criteria, it arrives at the wrong stage, and the job of resolving conflict goes unowned. The fix is to give people different roles and agree what feedback is useful at each stage.
Everyone brings something
Sales understands objections. Product understands the mechanism. Marketing understands channels. Leadership understands strategy. Technical teams understand evidence and risk. All of that input matters. The trouble starts when every stakeholder becomes a co-designer with an equal vote on every choice.
Give each person a role
One person should be accountable for the final brand decision. That may be the CEO in a small founder-led company, or a CMO or designated executive sponsor in a larger organisation. The owner weighs everyone’s feedback against the agreed strategy and makes the call.
Four roles in a rebrand
- Decision owner
Owns the brief, resolves disagreement and signs off.
- Core working team
Three to five people who give continuous input and have enough context to judge the system as it develops.
- Subject-matter reviewers
Named technical and legal reviewers who check claims, product accuracy, legal constraints or specialist audiences at defined stages.
- Wider stakeholders
Contribute context or answer specific questions, and leave the design to the core team.
Agree the criteria before anyone sees a design
Feedback improves when the team can answer “against what?” Before concepts appear, write down what the new brand must achieve. A set of criteria might read like this.
- Make the category clearer.
- Support enterprise credibility and keep founder energy.
- Carry technical diagrams and evidence well.
- Work across investor, customer and hiring materials.
- Be operable by the internal team.
Now “this direction makes the evidence harder to read” outweighs “I do not like this colour”.
Judge concepts against those criteria, the evidence and the use cases. A vote rewards the most familiar option and invites people to optimise for personal preference.
Match feedback to the stage
Feedback by stage
- Strategy
Discuss audience, category, proposition, evidence and differentiation. Leave fonts for later.
- Concept
Judge whether the creative direction expresses the agreed strategy. Reopen the business model only if something important has been missed.
- System
Test the identity in real use, across deck, web, diagrams, tables, hiring and reports.
- Production
Fix errors and implementation issues. Hold the strategic direction steady, even three days before launch.
Gather each round into one consolidated feedback document, and sign off clearly at the strategy, direction and final-system stages.
Ask for observations before solutions
“Make the logo bigger” is a solution. “The company name disappears when I scan the page” is an observation. Ask stakeholders to name the problem first, then let the design team choose the repair.
When two teams disagree
Return to the decision the brand has to support. If sales needs a more concrete proposition and leadership wants a more visionary one, both may be right for different materials. A hierarchy that adapts by material serves both sides.
The company owns its truth
External partners can challenge, synthesise and design. The company still owns the evidence, the strategic choices and final accountability. A healthy process makes that boundary explicit.
Tell us what needs to move.
Bring the brief if it is clear. If it is unclear, tell us where the work is stuck.
Bring us the problem
